A Participation Framework for Social Media

20 August 2009 by Michael Leis, View Comments

So you’ve read all the articles, heard all the pundits, and devised a social media strategy that provides the brand cause, articulation, and the publics where you want to participate. But now you’re staring at a blank screen, wondering how to actually engage meaningfully.

Where I start with clients is breaking down the communications into report, reply, reflect, curate, and share. Here’s a quick sketch of what each one means:

Report

In the state of social and distributed content as it stands now, basic reporting is the foundational building block for creating an effective presence. Observe what is happening around you. What are you listening to, working on, or thinking about that provides a positive peek into your daily life?

From the perspective of the creator, this activity sometimes feels like wading in a mixture of narcissism and banality. But if you’re talking with people who are interested enough to friend or follow you, these are the pings of personality.

Most detractors immediately cite the notion of someone “tweeting what they ate for lunch.” The reality is that the lunches are what they remember most, and they’re surprised to have such a visceral response to a seemingly trivial message. Of course, if you tweeted what you have for lunch every day, it will get tedious and tuned out. Just like any over-repeated message.

Reply

When people talk to you, about your brand or products, or just say something interesting in your community, reply. This seems self evident, but the existential weight of the position holding the brand out for everyone to see sometimes outweighs the tendency to send out a response.

In social media, there’s a kind of moral obligation to respond as much as possible, within appropriate boundaries (and there’s a whole framework for creating these boundaries, but that’s another article).

Even when people are bashing your brand, at least reply that you hear them, and are working on it. Even though the corporate in you says, “take this into email or private messaging,” resist. Reply to people as publicly as you can, for as long as you can. Demonstrate that you are a person, too.

If people in your network post a funny picture of their cat, say so. People really like getting replies. They know you’re in the network. You shouldn’t lurk, waiting for the perfect business scenario, like FAQs come to life. It doesn’t exist.

Reflect

Reflecting is a little more abstract. In the most basic sense, it’s a ReTweet on Twitter, or a “Links of the week” on your blog. It’s featuring the parts of that public you find valuable, and reflecting them back into the community. Reflecting does the work of both providing the social proof that you’re paying attention to the platform which you are a part, and the social object that strengthens your one-to-one relationship with those authors.

At a more granular level as a creator yourself, reflecting provides you the opportunity to learn how the people in that network structure communication, turn a phrase, set up a link. This exercise should be training you on how those people in that public want you to communicate with them.

Curate

As you see all these incredibly valuable updates and posts come down your activity streams, don’t just aggregate, curate. Curation is the act of cataloging, categorizing, as well as adding context and insight to the information you receive. Not only the content created by your marketing department, but of the community, where it fits with your brand cause.

By curating the information you get from social networks in social bookmark communities, your blog, and wherever else your audience is, you’re helping your own organization’s knowledge base, finding new valuable relationships and related content on those platforms: Everyone wins.

Share

While the concept of sharing encompasses everything a social media presence is about, in this practical framework we’re specifically talking about sharing content from within the organization and between networked publics.

First, it’s really common to take for granted that the information you see in the course of your job is the same as the information your audience knows about. Any time you run a survey, or have an R&D effort, bring what you can back to the places you engage. Create a graphic to express the information visually if you can.

You will be surprised at how much people appreciate the knowledge, the sneak peak at what’s coming next, or insights on the future of your industry. Just keep it casual and usable. Make it easy for people to scan and find value. In the case of surveys, release interesting data points in related groups over a few days.

By the same token, the information you see in the different publics is not the same perspective the people in those networks have. If there’s a hot topic on Twitter, share those links in your StumbleUpon, blog, Facebook, and MySpace. You’ll have to contextualize them differently depending on how the group works (see reflecting), but you’re most likely sharing content that group hasn’t seen before, and will find worthwhile.

Of course this isn’t the be-all, end-all. Hopefully it spurs you to think in a more practical sense about how to apply social media strategy.

What do you think? Do you use any similar frameworks? Let’s continue the conversation below in the comments, or on Twitter @mleis.

  • Share/Bookmark

Related posts:

  1. The Brand Cause: Focusing Social Media Strategy
  2. Social Media Use: Not For Everyone
  3. Social media treasures you already have
  4. Social Media Listening Misconceptions

  • Good cultural insights and reminders for an individual. We can regard ourselves as good practitioners and yet often find that even we slip of some of these key communication habits and thoughts. It's a good reminder and I'm going over my own habits now.
  • Anything people are passionate about can make great social media fodder.

    Take American Psycho, a good portion of it is detailed descriptions of what people are wearing. And I found it fascinating.

    What one person thinks it important is an indication to others what they are about and it's a good way to get to know someone... the person just may turn out to be boring, though. Boring people will put out boring content.
  • I have yet to come across any Indian who really tweets under lock and key....However Tweeting is mostly done by the early adopters ...Most Indian Companies have clearly understood the power of social media and this years election saw many young technocrats specially in the IT city of Bangalore who regularly tweeted their idea on making a difference and cutting across the digital divide that presently separates the two
  • Thanks for the comment Sumit -- I think you and Yu Yu are both right :) A national or global brand's audience actually has a pretty good chance of not being mentioned on Twitter. Why it's worth it to look around first and build a strategy that works for the audience and the brand's technology. So even if you didn't have a lot of audience on Twitter, you could leverage the API on the main site and use a few tweets to represent a larger perceptual social proof.

    Which leads to Yu Yu, and the fact that many cultures and subcultures exist, and the most natural way to speak with those audiences is to be of them, instead of at them. Make sense?
  • mollyanglin
    Hi Michael,

    Such great points! I especially liked your thoughts on replies - you hit the nail on the head with this one: "the existential weight of the position holding the brand out for everyone to see sometimes outweighs the tendency to send out a response." Marcom professionals are faced with a pretty fundamental shift in the way they think about their corporate communications... the folks who have to-date focused entirely on perfectly wordsmithed campaigns and press releases are now dealing with the incredibly daunting prospect of nimbly addressing their customers more personally - and that's scary shit! I see a lot of interest amongst my clients (they all sense opportunity,) but also a lot of fear ... Social media requires a greater degree of immediacy and reaction speed than anything else and I'm sure they think: "What if I say the wrong thing"? "What if my response is interpreted the wrong way?" "What if I say something that somehow violates our legal terms and we get sued?"... unfortunately, more often than not, this leads to conversational paralysis. Too bad, because you're absolutely right that a well-timed, personal, helpful response can create incredibly strong brand advocates. I like your idea of a "framework" - it provides somewhat of a sense of process and security to the difficult challenge of talking to people as opposed to talking at them... The Air Force has a really nice model for dealing with dialogue that seems to I think allay some of the fear with this form of communication and ensure that they come out looking pretty good. http://www.wired.com/dangerroom/2009/01/usaf-blog-respo/ . PR Firm Edelman also has a nice model for tackling social media and minimizing risk (Walk/Crawl/Run) - they describe it in a good paper about Obama's use of social media during his election campaign http://www.edelman.com/image/insights/content/Social%20Pulpit%20-%20Barack%20Obamas%20Social%20Media%20Toolkit%201.09.pdf

    p.s. Of all the people involved in brand building through social means that I've met over the years - you are by FAR the best... I've seen you apply all of the tactics mentioned above and am so impressed to have witnessed the outcome on your own reputation. respect :) Thanks for sharing the secret recipe!
  • @nlc_molly, you don't know how much your comment means to me. I really consider you one of the sharper tacks bridging UX, IA, and strategy, so for you to take the time to write this -- it made my week!

    In terms of the framework, I think that the most success in social channels happens when you approach it like radio: semi-spontaneous with a playlist of content, like radio shows. Scripted radio shows are awful. To do radio well, you need to have an outline, and then run through it before your shift starts.

    Same thing goes here. You need to hire someone who can effectively work within an approved outline. There's no way to script all of it anyway. And when I work with clients, the first thing to do is explore the fears. They're often fairly irrational, and social / distributed technology is actually closer to their business model anyway.

    You wouldn't expect to create a product and store it in Topeka, and then expect everyone to go there to buy. So you find out where they shop, and place your product there.

    In terms of saying something wrong, this falls under something I didn't discuss here, which is the idea of always striving to bury your posts. No single update should carry too much weight. The more posts you create, the more complete, personal, complex picture you're painting. In this case, keep stepping up to the plate and bat for average (purpose) instead of power. This also helps spread liability by providing more context, as the law always sits on the side of what's reasonable in context, and saying that you said something wrong, or correcting it on the fly only adds strength to the presence, reminding the audience that there's a person behind the account.

    All in all, it's no secret, as the hundreds of millions of people on social networks have already discovered as much. But hopefully, this framework will help companies consider the practical application in a more tangible way.

    Thanks again, Molly!
  • mollyanglin
    No problem! And thanks so much for the response! The radio analogy is really interesting... Would love to hear more about how that's approached. You come from a background in radio - don't you?

    Regarding "Topeka", have you seen Peter Merholz's post on Social Media & User Experience ? He raises some good points. Wishing the UX crowd could get beyond the "social media douchebag" factor and direct their big brains towards thinking about how to design a site that effectively bridge the activities of existing community. (Although, admittedly, you're one of the few who are.) A perfectly crafted user-friendly website is great... but one that attracts and retains the attention and ongoing discussion (both onsite and off) is worth aspiring to. Are there ways as UX designers that we can shepherd that phenomenon? I'm thinking yes.... and I'd love to see more discussion about the design attributes that can spark and engage external communities.
  • Great article (as usual) Michael. I agree with it pretty much across the board and echo what Yuyudin said above about transparency. That's what it all boils down to for me. And it's something companies are incredibly afraid of for some reason. But, if you apply the "Transparency Test" to each of the steps outlined above you'll see they make perfect sense.

    Yes, it's odd to think of having a casual conversation with your clients as if they are your friends, but I think if you can put it in that context it becomes much easier to do. Just be open, be respectful, listen, interact, and above all don't take yourself (meaning as a brand) so god damn serious. It is a person answering on the other end, not a machine, so it's perfectly fine to have a personality, to be genuine, and *gasp* maybe even stick your foot in your mouth from time to time.
  • Thanks Kirk -- glad you liked it! Not sure exactly how transparent it makes a company, but it certainly helps everyone when you can be open, respectful, listen, and interact. I think the seriousness is a style/tone brand issue. You can be serious, cordial, and helpful without w00t-ing your way around the Web.
  • Transparency is different in different cultures. India is #4 in countries that use twitter, yet a lot of folks tweet under lock and key. I've been asked a number of times whether I tweet openly or not, and I do tweet openly, even some of the controversial subject I'm not "supposed" to be talking about i.e. the Myanmar issues. Sometimes it's because of the mentality of the management. The older IT Indian companies don't want to be identified as "Indian"... but that mentality is changing thanks to the success of startups and proud Indian entrepreneurs.
  • Absolutely. It all boils down to being a good citizen, giving something of yourself, and helping people. I think as a writer, these ideas come naturally to you, but a lot of brands have trouble creating a structure to approach the everyday, experimental nature -- so I came to this as a way to frame those ideas -- provide an outline that will hopefully be helpful.
  • I call it "spreading the twitter karma" if you re-tweet others links, others will also do the same. Just make sure that they're valuable and relevant to your core audience. It'll make you gain followers, the organic way, and they will be useful people and not annoying bots.
    Responding in public and keeping things transparent should always be any organization's motto -- but the message has to be unified, anyone involved should know the language because social media IS the media -- it's where even the traditional media sources their stories. It also has a higher impact and a quicker viral effect.
blog comments powered by Disqus