Facebook Apps: the new Magazines?

21 May 2009 by Michael Leis, View Comments

Way back in college, I learned a great low-fidelity media planning research technique: finding out where an audience indexes highly with magazines. Magazines are so highly targeted, you can pick one up, categorize and count the editorial for the audience’s perception, and match that against the category count for advertising to understand the audience’s reality. Go ahead, try it! You’ll be surprised at how accurate a portrait this paints.

As I became more experienced in developing strategy for Websites, applications, and the like, the magazine question stayed as a part of my interview process, to learn what kinds of perceptions and realities those who were using interfaces held to gain a more complete picture of the mental models they’d be bringing to the system. It is always a funny conversation, because magazine choices are so personal. Without wavering, interviewees would offer up People, Time, and Readers’ Digest: These are safe, widely read publications.

But after prodding, the truth would come out in the form of Maxim, or Good Housekeeping, or some other magazine more niche and personal. Proving out that there is insight in these answers, people would be shocked that you even asked, as though they were revealing some dark secret.

As my focus has shifted into more social media applications and platforms, the users of these services have largely trended away from magazines, outside of titles like Parents that speak to a particlar life-stage.

Now, the moment of shock comes when I ask, “So what Facebook applications do you use?”

According to the interviewees, the socially acceptable answer is that applications are silly and extraneous. To some extent, the research bears this out, with AllFacebook reporting a 25% drop in traffic to top applications since the recent redesign.

By the same token, applications driven by such apparent sillyness like Living Social (Pick your five favorite beers, movies, etc.), and Superwall continue to draw almost 50 million monthly active users. Just as I wrote this post, I was updated that a FB friend is most like the Grease character Rizzo.

So please, don’t let anyone tell you they don’t use Facebook applications. Quite the opposite: Facebook applications are the new magazine: highly personal content that shapes how people are entering into social discourse with their peers. It’s this kind of perspective that will help brands understand (and hopefully facilitate) the ways people indulge their daily flights of fancy and build stronger ties with those that share their views.

  • Share/Bookmark

Related posts:

  1. MySpace Apps – how we doin’ so far?
  2. Is Facebook the new Thanksgiving tradition?
  3. MySpace: Promote, Facebook: Friends, Twitter: People
  4. Facebook Welcomes You to Digital Suburbia

  • suredoc
    I've been thinking about this since I read it yesterday. I only use the Living Social books piece. I block nearly everything else. However, now I'm thinking content strategy. Niche magazines have niche writers. Having unique content to the application will make or break the magazine model. I can get news anywhere. But on FB if I can get articles that are only published within that framework, I'll keep coming back. I like magazine comparison, a lot.
  • Thanks! Glad it got you thinking. It's interesting how the behaviors are similar in terms of gleaning niche information that is valuable to share within the peer group to help form identity and hierarchy as part of the social discourse.

    And your point is especially interesting in light of micropayments being opened (eventually) to third party developers. What if I could give you a virtual birthday cake and a year's subscription to content suited to you from a variety pf publishers or musicians? Lots to think about there. Thanks for contributing!
  • I'm imagining a Circle of the Initiated, like the executive bathroom on the Simpsons, where everything is gold plated and a servant hands you a towel.

    But seriously, what if Facebook was like a game — after you've successfully completed the first level, you get to another, cooler level with more and better features? Like the ability to add a thumbs down "don't like" comment. Or to make up your own gifts, like ... I dunno ... seltzer in your face for people being silly or pacifiers for whiners.
  • I've also been thinking about an application that would show ambivalence. Everything is so separated into "Like" kinds of clicks. What if I want to let someone know that I simply don't want any specific harm to befall them, though it really doesn't affect me either way? :)
  • Using myself as a stand-in for all humanity (a time-honored usability principle) I suggest the typical timeline of Facebook application use looks something like this:

    Month 1: Just joined Facebook, looking for friends
    Month 2: I have lots of friends now and some of them are doing these top 5 lists, what's that?
    Month 3: I'm cool because I picked my top 5 punk rock bands and one of them was Husker Du!
    Month 4: Actually, I don't care which Buffy character you are because I never watched the show.
    Month 5: These top 5 lists are really annoying. I'm sick of responding to hugs and easter eggs and green beer, plus I'm pretty sure these are just gimmicks by advertisers to mine my personal data and preferences.
    Month 6: Install "Facebook Purity" and magically remove all top 5 lists and other evidence of applications from my feed. Yay!
  • Now don't be modest. You are the singular embodiment of all users. Thank you for leaving a lil green patch of your thoughts.

    You've also uncovered an opportunity: the month 7 app. What can we develop for the people sick of all the starter applications?
blog comments powered by Disqus