Brands: Bring Twitter Home With You

2008 July 22
by Michael Leis

Twitter_carry_out_2

In spending last Thursday afternoon with the great folks in digital marketing at Macmillan, I had a moment: is the missed opportunity for brands a lack of understanding where it comes to context?

Brands are beginning to see that microblogging works when you reach out. However, when you look at how dramatically the meaning changes depending on the design and context of the delivery, microblogging is even more powerful when you bring the power of the platform back to your site and complete the loop.

I’m going to take for granted that you have a firm grasp on microblogging. If you haven’t already scanned ahead to the next bolded subhead, stop for a second and check out:

Our own articles on microblogging narrative convention, the CB radio of today, and how microblogging creates a narrative as involving to an audience as a screenplay.

How brands are using Twitter for customer service at Read Write Web.

David Armano’s macro-tastic look at Micro-interactions is a great visual vista on the entire ecosystem.

Microblogging changes meaning depending on design and context

One of the really great and unexpected facets of Twitter is how many nice, talented people I have had the pleasure to meet in person already (only having used it for about two months). But what we have had in common is the platform. Each person has their own ecosystem for Twitter, and my combination isn’t theirs.

Here are just a few of the ways I’m communicating with other people who are also on the Twitter platform:

On the iPhone

Iphone_shots_2

The iPhone is a great example because there are already a handful of companies competing for Twitter users in the space. As you can see in the shot, Hahlo, Twitteriffic, and Twinkle (right to left) are all representing the same types of information, but each of them has a slightly different user experience and meaning because of the interface design.

On the Desktop

Twhirl_2

Pictured here is Twhirl, the desktop application I use to access the Twitter platform. Again, while the information it presents is the same, the meaning is different because of the interface design, and the context it sits in on the desktop.

Back onto the Web

Zappos_twitter

There are a number of ways that Twitter is represented in the Web browser, but the one that springs to mind as most directly related to this topic is at twitter.zappos.com. Here, they aggregate all the tweets of all the Zappos employees on the platform. Anytime you refresh the page, you’re getting an instant snapshot of what’s happening in the lives of the people who are making Zappos run.

But it can extend further back to the brand

Now that we’ve shown that you can put any combination of tweets on any number of simultaneous display technologies, think about the connection it can make when brought all the way back to your brand’s Web presence.

Meet the Maker

It’s not uncommon to see bloggers put a widget in a side column that displays their latest tweets. And that works, because it’s an accompaniment to the writing that appears in the flow of the main column.

Now, think about it if you could see a small selection of the most recent tweets from the person who designed the branded site you’re visiting.

What about the industrial designer who made the product you are considering purchasing?

Bo_twitter

Or the tweets from the author you love while they’re on tour promoting an upcoming title?

Regardless of the product-appropriateness of the tweets themselves, adding microblogging back into the context of the “mother site” must considerably affect purchase because it creates a perceived personal connection with the user. It allows for deeper consideration of the product or service, and reminds you that you’re not just buying into a system, but a way to interact with the people who are creating what appears there.

What do you think? If you’ve gotten this far down, you must have something to add to the conversation!

  • Share/Bookmark

Related posts:

  1. Twitter Organized for Business
  2. How to Broadcast Your Brand Through Twitter
  3. 4 brands that need a widget
  4. Oprah, Twitter, Moms and CPG

  • @Alan Just had this discussion with a client the other day. I don't think you can do it if your tweeting is coming from corporate or PR. Which is the biggest hitch right now: trusting your employees. I took this viewpoint for granted in writing the post, so thank you for bringing it up. Well worth mentioning.

    A lot of PR and corporate comm. folks are looking at this as though it needs to come from them, which it shouldn't - they should be facilitating, guiding, teaching, sharing. And jeez -- how much better would they be in their jobs of understanding their client if they were in a regular internal dialogue with employees?

    Where you talk about conglomerates, what does that mean? To me, it's an amalgamation of a number of smaller companies/ vendors. If those folks tweeted, and brought it back as a part of the online representation of the product, they'd be syndicating their own conversational competitive advantage across ecommerce sites. That would be a huge advantage, if possible. Then your large faceless conglomerate is actually... gulp... a wide array of both buyers and sellers? Facilitating conversation?

    What you're saying about the line between personal and business is a fascinating one for me. The difference is completely perceptual, semantic. Will be covering this a bit in a future post with Brandie Feuer, who tweets personally from one account, and on behalf of Luxor in another.

    @stacy @brennen -- as you can see above, I'm in complete agreement. To me, every time you apply a microblog stream to almost any page, it becomes more personal, interesting, valuable. An instant reason to spend another moment of consideration, evaluation, and to come back because there is content always refreshing. It's not about reach, just reaching those who count.
  • @awolk: Forget the PR department. If I'm reading about a Ford automobile, I want to hear from the actual engineers. What are they all about? What do they have to say about cars?
  • For people who really like to research products before they purchase them, the opportunity to "meet the makers" via microblogging is probably both comforting and convincing. A real person makes this widget!
  • stacyvanwickler
    @awolk: Surely a large corporation in the business of non-human interaction ala electronics, video games, automotive, even finance can get social with fellow acolytes. Those big companies employ young, digital natives, too.
  • I think it's very dependent on the product and how personal it is.
    Tweets of the sort you suggest coming from a large corporation would feel fake and would, likely, be fake creations of the PR dept.
    Or they'd feel inappropriate - I like my conglomerates big and impersonal.

    But for a business with a lot of human interaction-- hotels come to mind-- it could serve to make them feel much more personal and welcoming. Ditto any small company or start-up.

    One thing we do have to keep in mind though is where the line between business and personal is drawn. To which the likely solution is two accounts.
blog comments powered by Disqus